This is a classic case of a Hollywood courtroom drama ... all of us know that this is not fiction drama but a discernible case of defamation, harassment and of course to prove who is the real victim.
Amber Heard a victim of physical abuse was the first of the many to voice it during the #metoomovement. She repeatedly mentioned in her several interviews that Johnny was a wife-beater, a substance abuser, an alcoholic and a weed smoker. She also said in one of her many interviews that how she would be constantly in fear that johnny Depp would hit and abuse her. Sympathies were all out for her courage and resilience. What transpired between them was mentioned by her in her many interviews. It must have been hard to take all the " shit & abuse " but in the end came out like a shining star and a hope for woman who faces domestic violence. On the other hand, Depp lost work and reputation globally. Overnight I am sure he must have lost a lot of friends, above all his reputation went downhill.
Johnny boy was licked out and left wounded. HE needed to clear his name and in desperation started suing. In 2020, Depp lost a libel case in which he sued the Britain-based News Group Newspapers, publisher of the Sun, and its executive editor, Dan Wootton, for publishing a 2018 story with the headline “Gone Potty: How can JK Rowling be ‘genuinely happy’ casting wife-beater Johnny Depp in the new Fantastic Beasts film?”
Amber Heard had enough people to back her up for this case, and in the end, was the winner. Depp then files another case of defamation, this time for 50 million against Heard. Confident Amber countersues him, and thus begins the trial.
But wait a minute now things seem to be different, the claims made by Amber are in the red. There is deep speculation about " IS AMBER REALLY A VICTIM OR IS DEPP THE REAL VICTIM" Did we judge Depp wrong? Did the media just turn Depp into a monster just for getting more readership, eyeballs, headlines and scoop?
I have been following all the videos of the courtroom trial that's going on. Listening and watching each and every deposition. Though we cannot be conclusive for me Amber Heard is losing the plot completely. Depp's lawyers have been thorough with each and every piece of evidence, without going into the HE said - SHE said formulae.
Let's go with the pieces of evidence
1. No bruises found on Amber - Depp's lawyers produce photos in court to counter the bruise lie
2. The police themselves confirm the same- Reports and CCTV camera proves the same.
3. Voice recordings and CCTV footages produced as pieces of evidence prove that Amber Heard is abusive and a baiter.
4. She did not, I say did not donate the pledged money to the charitable org as she claimed to have donated all the money.
5 She tried taking more money from Depp by asking him to pay the double amount of alimony if he pays the 7 mln money directly to the charity. My question is why would u do that? If you have pledged the 7 mln why not give it? What's your concern with his tax benefits? It also means u pledged yours too for tax benefits?
6. She claims that Depp was the physical abuser, instead she admits that she was the one who hit deep and was constantly baiting him with her badgering to lose his mind.
7. Her friends and family partied on Depp's money and were freeloaders.
8. She cheated on Depp CCTV footage has it on records
9. She admits that she uses drugs, camera footage proves alcoholic
10. Amber Heard comes out to be a liar, abuser and cheater in court.
Her asst speaks badly of Amber, the asst states that Amber did not pay her much remuneration and Amber had a temper.
Amber, she speaks disdainfully to Depp's lawyer. She constantly trying very hard to cry to gain sympathy.
The conclusion is Amber heard is a bully and has used the woman victim card synonymously. She was sure that Johnny Depp would not counter sue her, as his public image would be tarnished. This is where she went wrong, Depp has not only sued her but insisted that the ongoing trial is videoed and goes live.
In this entire trial, Amber comes across as shifty and crafty, with some twisty indirect answers. She is caught on the wrong foot when she gives an example of buying a house in instalments and donating money to Charity as same. Her lawyers were not able to prove that the police did not investigate properly instead turned out that after calling the police Amber was not interested in reporting the incident and did not want to talk about it at all. The police also confirmed that there were no signs of altercation nor signs of bruises on Amber.
Depp on the other hand comes across as a calm, composed and at ease person. His team seems to have put all the pieces of evidence, be it footage, photos or text messages in defence. Johnny Depp's lawyer, Camille Vasquez shreds Amber's lies piece by piece and turns the tables on AMBER HEARD. Camille corners her, brings out her lies and in the end, it looks like Amber could be sued for perjury.
Johnny Depp on the other hand has played it well, thus proving that he is an amazing actor. My first question is who records conversations between husband and wife and why? My second question is why did he not call her out during the divorce, she had brought out all this evidence against him during the divorce too. The team's strategic move of bringing Camille to question is really brilliant. But all this speculation about deep and Camille in a relationship? Is it to prove to the world that he is still the man that a woman wants to be with, feels safe and secure and is a successful and dynamic lawyer herself. The little concerns about phone wires, water, juices etc seem to be a part of a definitive narrative and screenplay. Johnny the whole time in the courtroom with his head down showing only humour as an emotion is also a part of that narrative. People coming all out to support Depp shows that he does have close bondings with people, unlike Amber who has turned against her. Her sister surely is a freeloader and now must be feeling the heat of Amber.
The mention of drugs and alcohol free-flowing is repulsive and definitely questions their lifestyle and mental and physical health. Why is Depp only being labelled as a druggy, weedy and alcoholic? Amber, her sister and her friends did that too so why aren't they being labelled too? For me, both parties need to retrospect their habits and lifestyle seriously. Their substance abuse reflects on their faces and language ( Abuses being hurled at each other )
A word of advice to Amber, the power suits and the fierce hairstyle is not helping u in court, makes u severe, hard and crafty.
Whatever the outcome is, for me Depp is surely a winner for taking a firm stand and hope that he wins this to prove that men can be abused too, they too are victims of domestic abuse ... there is no gender to abuse.
Reminds me of a case in India #hritikroshan vs #kanganaranaut. for me, Kangana & her sister were the real Ambers in this case abusers and mudslingers to the core !!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment