The premise of the movie ( Long distance relationship ) is great, but as the movie progresses I found it super regressive. The girl has done her BBA, interviews her going to be husband, yet has no time or inclination to go through the biodatas sent by the matchmaker.
Secondly what was the reason to take the men's coat to start the interview? Surprisingly her family was OK with a guy who is yet struggling to get a job but has no intention in their daughter's career. The marriage happens because they have the same name as Parvati and Shiva ... seriously should we encourage this kind of content at this age and date ?
They get married, he gets a job, moves to Bangalore, and both their journey begins. I would like to know what was the reason behind insisting on only bachelors and not married men? This does not make sense at all. Secondly, he is presenting app concepts but I thought he was a coder. which coder is asked to present concepts?
The father-in-law does not insist on the daughter teaching her nephew, but the daughter-in-law is asked not to take up the job because she as to teach the nephew. The daughter-in-law meekly agrees.
The aunt wants the same saree which is sold and makes snide remarks on daughter-in-law's friend questioning her character of a special friend, the father in law supports it too !!! She was going to blore with her father-in-law and nephew but when she is in the cab wanting to dance ... she is alone in the cab !!
The end was the laziest ending that one can ever come across in cinema, the writer and director did not know how to end it .... so let's get thalaiva in to end the show !!!
#thalaiva #rajnikant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzcjhEDel1c&t=5s